LEADERSHIP EXCELLENCE FOR EXECUTIVES AND ENTREPRENEURS 

www.randgolletz.com 


In today's issue

>> A note from Rand

>> Feature Article: Attributes of Superior Leaders and Managers

>> Additional Thoughts: Call it Anything but "Empowerment"



 Note from Rand

We’re now into spring in the mid-Atlantic region. It seems that winter was really long, if not particularly harsh. My heating bills now get replaced with lawn mowing and yard upkeep bills. C’est la vie!

 

My two pieces this month concern subjects of universal interest. The first covers those attributes I believe are critical for leadership or management success. I’ve used this framework for a number of years, and I update it frequently, based primarily on clients’ input. I’m interested in your perspective; let me know your thoughts.

 

The second covers the subject of empowerment. In many organizations in the last decade, empowerment of the workforce became management abdication. I’ve got a few tips for you to consider when venturing down the path of delegation and dispersion of decision-making in your organization.

 

Happy Spring!


 Feature Article: Attributes of Superior Leaders and Managers

One of the most popular ongoing debates of the last decade concerns the distinctions between management and leadership and their relative importance to organizational success. John Kotter of the Harvard Business School cited “alignment” as the most critical difference. Effective leaders, he said, engage the hearts as well as the minds of followers to produce productive organizational change. Warren Bennis, perhaps the most quoted and revered expert on the subject, promoted a similar notion. Jim Kouzas and Barry Posner, whose book The Leadership Challenge is the most frequently cited as the seminal work on the subject, outlined the five best practices and ten commitments of effective leaders. Marcus Buckingham, in his new book The One Thing You Need to Know, says that the one thing great managers know about managing is this: “Discover what is unique about each person and capitalize on it.”

 

As the promotion of leadership became more pervasive, the importance of management (planning, organizing, staffing and controlling) took a back seat and its sex appeal diminished. Little wonder, considering that grand visions and emotional engagement are much more stimulating than planning, organizing, staffing and controlling.

 

Here’s what I know for certain: Effective leadership and management are both required to set appropriate direction and achieve planned results. One is expansive; one is reductive. One is about doing the right things; one is about doing things right. One sets the course; the other steers the ship. Some people are more effective leaders; others are more effective managers. Take either away and any organization is doomed.

 

I believe that managerial and leadership success requires seven key attributes. While no one achieves perfection in all of these areas, most effective managers understand their strengths and limitations explicitly and make sure that the latter do not accrue to their own or their organizations’ detriment. See if you agree with my list:

 

Strong Business Orientation and Understanding

Exhibits outstanding acumen and judgment. Thinking of the needs of stakeholders comes as second nature. Achieves results. Never uses excuses. Has a clear understanding of the anatomy and competitive dynamics of the business. Focuses on most critical areas. Balances short- and long-term priorities across constituencies. Understands principles of value creation.

 

Assumes Accountability, Initiative and Leadership

Has a strong desire to lead. Assumes initiative, even in the absence of formal authority. Keeps apprised of the important operating level details of the organization without impairing empowerment. Is assertive without being overwhelming. Builds a competitive team focused on creating value, not on creating bureaucracy. Merit rather than politically driven. Raises expectations of performance continuously. Delivers on commitments. Objective. Identifies and prevents potential problems. Can accept and learn from personal defeats. Cuts losses.

 

Energizes Teams

Aligns teams to achieve organizational and team goals, not protect personal interests and/or prerogatives. Facilitates conflict resolution and genuine communication. Cultivates commitment, loyalty and trust; doesn’t expect fealty; understands the difference. Really listens. Provides feedback that is constructive and in real time. Coaches and counsels in a productive manner. Helps people discover and achieve their potential.

 

Transforms Organization

Has a clear vision and the courage to change, not only run the organization. Has a raging impatience with the status quo. Creates urgency and consensus around change initiatives while recognizing that giving people a say doesn’t necessarily mean giving them a vote. Willing to experiment and challenge her/his own thinking. Asks penetrating questions that reframe perspectives and undermine preconceptions. Is flexible and yet riveted on mission and goals.

 

Judgment and Action Regarding People

Selects and profiles people objectively. Very adept at recruiting and developing. Personally secure; relishes hiring and promoting high achievers. Promotes based upon merit; “leapfrogs” people where appropriate. Is a tough minded (but not hard-headed) performance evaluator.

 

Curiosity and Thinking Capacity.

Thinks multi-dimensionally. Learns about global issues related to own industry/organization as well as the world overall. Perceives the patterns of external change and integrates them into her/his own thinking. Is intellectually curious and open-minded.

 

Emotional Intelligence

Self-confident but self-deprecating. Has a realistic assessment of her/himself. Controls or redirects disruptive/destructive impulses. Has the capacity to suspend judgment, to think before acting. Understands the impact that her/his moods, emotions and actions have on others. Understands the distinctive emotional make-up of others and is skilled in treating people considering their reactions.  Builds rapport.


 Additional Thoughts: Call it Anything but "Empowerment"

I’ve written about this subject a few times in a variety of publications and from different angles. The last time was within the context of “teams.” Empowerment perplexes and intrigues people, so it’s worth a periodic re-examination.

 

First, a little perspective: I hate buzzwords. They provide business people with too easy a way of referring to complex phenomena, frequently degrading the original concept. One example: Re-engineering. Michael Hammer and James Champy coined the phrase to describe a “radical redesign of business processes to achieve dramatic improvements in quality, service and productivity.” Hammer’s article in the Harvard Business Review, entitled “Re-engineering – Don’t Automate, Obliterate,” was appropriately greeted with awe. Many great companies got on the re-engineering bandwagon and implemented the concept productively. Within a couple of years, however, the word re-engineering became synonymous with indiscriminate layoffs. No radical re-design. No improvement in service.

 

In the 1990s, the word empowerment became another such word, creating confusion and angst for managers and workforces looking to balance equitable power dispersion and effective decision-making. Managers’ desire to either appease their workforce or desperately cling to their own power often resulted in either abdication or even more entrenched autocracy.

 

I try really hard not to use the “e word” anymore, because of the differing definitions that reside in the heads of listeners. Instead, I now employ the phrase “effective delegation.”

 

Four elements must be considered and integrated to implement effective delegation: authority, autonomy, responsibility and accountability.

 

Authority concerns the parameters within which a manager will allow an individual or team to make decisions and take action. Undefined authority frequently leads to second-guessing and turmoil. In those cases in which precision on the front end isn’t possible, associates need to keep their manager or team sponsor in the information loop more closely than if authority is well defined.

 

Autonomy means freedom from oversight. That can only exist to the degree that the manager’s anxiety allows. Former Intel CEO Andrew Grove coined the phrase task-relevant maturity to frame thinking about delegation. He believed that authority and autonomy must be earned by demonstrating skills and achieving solid past performance relative to specific tasks. While this logic is intuitively obvious, its implications are rarely considered adequately in practice.

 

Responsibility relates to the scope and impact of a person’s job. An effective manager would not delegate strategic information technology decisions to a 25-year-old sales guy with no technology background.

 

Accountability is a word that our society throws around indiscriminately. Accountability refers to consequences — in an organizational context, the consequences of decisions and actions. Without consequences, accountability doesn’t exist.

 

Depending on the circumstances and the performance, consequences can be either positive or negative. A sales person’s consequence for exceeding his sales plan may include a huge bonus or increased commission. A project manager’s consequence for missing target dates and cost objectives might be the loss of his job. The greater the degree of delegation, the more precise and unyielding accountability for results needs to be.

 

When delegating, over-simplification can be deadly. Many managers view competence as an all-or-nothing proposition. If John is competent, then he is totally competent in all areas. If John is not competent in any area, he is therefore totally incompetent in all areas. A primary part of a manager’s job is to identify areas of unique competence and deploy them productively. Expansive, well thought-out delegation is one way to do that. 


 About Rand Golletz

Rand Golletz is a executive coach and consultant. With more than 25 years in leadership roles, including CEO, chief marketing officer of a Fortune 100 company and international strategy consultant, Rand brings an unparalleled level of business expertise to his profession.