Here's a list of some people I feel really sorry for:
- Michael Jackson's therapist (Who IS that guy?
WHAT is that guy?)
- Mike Tyson's accountant (only kidding Mike –
really!)
- The choir director in my church (Would
somebody please tell those people the truth about their
voices?!)
- Derek Jeter's social secretary (busier than a
one-legged man in a butt-kicking contest).
- Rosie O'Donnell's personal coach (Where do you
begin? When would it end?)
- Here's one just for my friends in Maryland and
Virginia: The guys in charge of planning street construction
in Montgomery County, Md., and Fairfax County, Va. (Um …
sorry fellas. I hate to be the one to break it to you, but
it's too late!)
- Finally and most importantly: All business
leaders who care THAT they are known by others, but don't
cultivate HOW they are known by others.
On that final point: I get frequent
inquiries/requests from managers of client companies like
this:
"Rand, I'd like you to find out what my boss and my
co-workers really think of me. All of my performance reviews
indicate that I walk on water, but I haven't been promoted in
five years. I get a feeling that there's something that I need
to know, that I don't know."
I'll then request and receive the names of the people I
ought to talk to and begin my mission, doggedly pursuing my
quarry and relentlessly asking questions until I get to the
bottom of things. I almost always end up with a version of my
client's "story" that looks nothing like the official,
personnel file, performance review, development planning
version.
I call it their "water-cooler story."
Your water-cooler story is the version of you that people
talk about when you're not around; it's the version of you
that gets whispered or implied with a wince or a shrug.
Here's an example:
Your company is assembling a product development team. In a
meeting, your name gets mentioned as a possible team-leader.
Someone — a trusted, credible person — grimaces, implying that
putting you in charge would be ill-advised. The idea gets
dropped.
Another example:
Your name is brought up as a promotion candidate for an
executive-level job reporting to the CEO. In the discussions
of your candidacy that ensue, two of the CEO's "direct
reports" bring up examples of past interactions with you that
were, according to them, unsatisfactory. As a result, the CEO
decides to retain Korn-Ferry to conduct a search for the
position that will include both internal and external
candidates. He assures you that you remain the primary
candidate and that the search is really a formality, a matter
of completing a process that will assuredly result in your
being offered the position. Korn-Ferry then interviews you,
but one of the external candidates gets the job.
In both cases, you got zapped by your "water-cooler
story."
Your initial reaction might be to dismiss these examples as
implausible, but don't kid yourself. In large corporations,
the official version of your story might inform the size of
your raise or the level of your bonus, but the thing that will
more often than not determine your career trajectory and
velocity is your water-cooler story. You say you're not a
Fortune 500 honcho. No problem! Whether you're a business
owner, a smaller company manager or a non-managerial
professional, the same deal applies. Your WCS will either help
secure your success or make your life really difficult.
I recommend that you aggressively manage your water-cooler
story. Here's how:
• Build mechanisms to frequently and systematically procure
feedback from constituents.
• Ask precise, relevant questions that can catalyze action.
"How am I doin'?" isn’t good enough.
• Persist until you get to the "brutal truth."
• Develop and implement specific plans, using what you
learn, to improve your performance.
Most people aren't comfortable giving or getting feedback,
so they provide it or pursue it (when they actually do it at
all) without energy or conviction. In response, they receive
generalities that can't be acted upon (of course they can
"check the box" when the drill is completed).
Poor leaders view feedback as a sign of weakness. You know,
trying to please the masses rather than demonstrating a steely
core. By indulging their egos and exercising their
perogatives, these people undermine success.
Great leaders, on the other hand, pursue feedback with
vigor, tenacity and insistence. Then they act on what they
learn. That's a big part of how they got where they are
and, more importantly, how they became who they
are.