If you lead an organization — anything from a two-person
start-up to a Fortune 500 — and your people are achieving
planned results regularly, congratulations to them; they're
doing a great job. If, however, they are not regularly
achieving planned results, then you are not
doing your job!
Here's the deal: As an organizational leader, you hire the
people, you establish the standards, you set the expectations
and you manage the performance. If you are doing those things,
there's a good chance that planned results will happen. If you
aren't, they won't. Pretty simple.
A quick story: I got a call from a senior leader of a
Fortune 100, I'll call him Fred, ostensibly to work with
one of his direct reports, John. As Fred told me the
story, John had a "rough engagement style." For those of you
not tuned into corporate jargon, that meant that the guy
didn't play well with others.
At the appointed time, I visited separately with Fred and
John to discuss the issue and to get their separate takes on
whether they saw the problem similarly. As it turned out, my
bringing up the issue with John was the first that he had
heard of it. Not one discussion with Fred had happened –
ever!
When I raised the point with Fred, he gazed at me in
disbelief. "I'm not going to have that discussion with John,"
he said. "He might get angry or dispirited!"
I kept my dismay to myself. I am, after all, a trained
professional! Instead, I calibrated my response and tone both
to get to the point and make sure Fred heard it.
"So, Fred," I began, "what I'm hearing you say is that
dealing with this issue will be my problem, not yours." I
really expected a response something like this: "Not at all,
Rand. I didn't know how to deal with this, so I was kind of
hoping that you could help me as well as John."
Not quite!
Instead, Fred responded with "that's right." I took a deep
breath and shared with him the story of another of my clients,
a Fortune 100 CEO who spends an average of 500 hours a year
reviewing the performance and development of the top 200
managers in his company. Fred then asked, "When does he have
the time to do his job?" My disbelief deepened.
I won't continue with this story; you get the picture. I
get re-aggravated just to think that this $million a year
caveman actually believed that he didn't own any part of his
peoples' performance and development.
The four lessons for you from this story:
• Your people have a right to understand how their
performance "fits into the whole." You have an obligation to
make sure they do.
• Your people have a right to have their performance linked
to organizational plans in a specific way and documented as
well as discussed at the beginning of each performance period.
You have an obligation to make that happen.
• Your people have the right to have their performance vs.
your expectations discussed precisely, regularly and
frequently. You have an obligation to do that.
• Your people have a right to understand their prospects.
You have an obligation to discuss that with them at least
annually.
I'm not talking here about "lapsing into terminal
niceness." You cannot possibly achieve success as an
organizational leader without doing these things. You won't
get results; you won't get performance; you won't get respect
and, ultimately (and quite frankly, hopefully), you won't get
to keep your job.
This is not tangential stuff; it gets to the heart of
performance and it represents a huge opportunity and problem
for most leaders. If you can honestly say that you do a good
job on these matters currently, congratulations. You're in the
minority. If not, you're missing a primary opportunity for
leadership leverage. While your situation may not be as dire
as Fred's, you're the one who needs the coach!