Considering the fact that buyers are the lifeblood of any
business, it's amazing that more businesses, especially
smaller businesses, don't employ formal mechanisms for getting
buyer feedback. I suspect that part of the reason is that we
all wince at bad news, even when we profess that we want it.
Most of us take criticism personally and either find a way to
blame the provider or create a reason that any transgression
is an anomaly. The fact is, however, that frequent
feedback from buyers – the more stinging the better – can make
the difference between prosperity and bankruptcy.
My question: Are you better off knowing how your buyers
regard you or not? The answer ought to be obvious. I've got
some examples that are instructive:
A couple of years ago, I got an e-mail with an attached
PowerPoint presentation from a person I'd never met. It seems
that he and a business associate had made a guaranteed
reservation at a hotel in Houston. They arrived late at night,
and the front desk clerk had given their room to a walk-in. A
lengthy discussion ensued between these two guys and the front
desk clerk. The bottom line: The clerk had blown it but
concocted excuse after excuse to convey his belief that they
were culpable because of their late arrival. A couple of days
later, these two guys (the irate customers) crafted a lengthy,
very humorous PowerPoint presentation and sent it to the clerk
and the hotel manager.
Hang-on; the problem gets hairier. They also sent a copy of
the presentation to about 1,000 of their friends, associates
and acquaintances. I became curious as to how many people had
eventually received the PowerPoint, so I called a few of the
1,000 people and asked them two questions: "How many people
did you send it to?" and "Would you please share a few of
their names?" I then called a few of those people and asked
the same questions. Here's the killer: Per my own conservative
estimate, about 50,000 people eventually received a copy.
In our age of electronic connectivity, bad news travels far
and fast.
There's a brighter, flip-side to this coin.
A few years ago we had some bad winter storms and lost a
number of shingles on our cedar shake roof. A neighbor had a
restoration company over to do work at their home, and I asked
this company about getting a roofer to look at our roof. They
recommended that I call Gene Phifer with Phifer Construction
in Montgomery County, Maryland. I called him, he came out and
walked the roof. He said it was OK, but that he'd look at it
the following year to reassess its condition. So, for the next
couple of years, I called him in the fall. Each time, he
walked the roof, reassessed its condition and repeated that
while the shingles were getting dry, the underlying roofing
paper was still good. He never charged for this service nor
exploited our ignorance. When we finally decided to replace
the roof, I called him to get an estimate. I also got
estimates from two other companies and completed reference
checks. Everyone raved about Gene's service — he even
maintained one elderly man's roof that he hadn't installed —
and we decided to hire him.
After we signed the agreement, he showed up when he said he
would, his workers were pleasant and they cleaned up after the
job. Sometime after completion, we had severe storms and
experienced a couple of problems where water seeped in through
a roof addition and around skylights in our screened-in porch.
We called and he was out immediately. (I'm talking within two
hours!) He boarded up the area until the rain subsided and
then returned promptly to correct the problems. He followed up
to be sure it remained secure. Later he had his painter
repaint water-stained areas (including areas that existed
prior to his roofing job). Because of our
experience/recommendation, he has done at least three of our
neighbors' roofs.
Gene Phifer is not Jack Welch nor Peter Drucker. He doesn't
have a Harvard MBA. What he does have is an innate sense of
the lifetime value of a customer.
The lessons from these two examples are obvious, but I'll
enumerate a few of them briefly:
• In the information age, word travels quickly and
broadly.
• Marketing is not primarily about focus groups and
systematic feedback; it's largely about keeping every
commitment you make. (You can read more about this from our January
2006 issue ). The rule of thumb: under-commit and
over-deliver — not the other way around.
• A "can-do" obsession will overcome minor lapses in
quality or service. The guy at the hotel treated his customers
with antagonism. Gene Phifer knew that the real test of
product and service quality came after the original work was
done.
At Value Connection, our knowledge products and
Anchor Program for business owners will help you achieve and
sustain success beyond what you currently think possible. Click
here or call us for more information.